Basic Info
-
Technologist
![]()
Male, 38 years old
Los Angeles, United States
Last Login: 06 Sep, 2008
Tool Box
-
Recent Posts
-
→ Soft Power (Mon, 18 Aug 2008)
→ Response to Thomas Friedman (Sat, 16 Aug 2008)
→ No Smoking Hot Spot - Dr. David Evans in The Australian (Sun, 20 Jul 2008)
→ Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate (Fri, 18 Jul 2008)
→ 2006 Sojourners/Call to Renewal Conference Excerpt (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
→ Windfall Profits for Dummies (Sat, 03 May 2008)
→ Let's Pop the Deficit Bubble (Fri, 02 May 2008)
→ Esteem for US rises in Asia, thanks to Iraq war (Sat, 26 Apr 2008)
→ Notable & Quotable - From the latest debate among Democrats (Wed, 23 Apr 2008)
→ Older Americans wealthier, living longer (Fri, 28 Mar 2008)
→ The Erosion of Individual Responsibility (Sun, 23 Mar 2008)
→ How Government Makes Things Worse - Jeff Jacoby (Mon, 17 Mar 2008)
→ On the passing of William F. Buckley Jr. (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
→ Press Corps Quagmire (Tue, 19 Feb 2008)
→ She Said What? (Mon, 18 Feb 2008)
→ 'Realism' in Syria (Fri, 15 Feb 2008)
→ Greenhouse Affect (Wed, 13 Feb 2008)
→ Notable & Quotable (Wed, 13 Feb 2008)
→ 'Misinformed Craze' For Hybrids Delays Greener Technology (Mon, 11 Feb 2008)
→ Studies Say Biofuels Worse Than Gasoline (Sun, 10 Feb 2008)
How Government Makes Things Worse - Jeff Jacoby
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 at 01:59 PM
The crisis has its roots in the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, a Carter-era law that purported to prevent “redlining� - denying mortgages to black borrowers - by pressuring banks to make home loans in “low- and moderate-income neighborhoods." Under the act, banks were to be graded on their attentiveness to the “credit needs� of “predominantly minority neighborhoods." The higher a bank's rating, the more likely that regulators would say yes when the bank sought to open a new branch or undertake a merger or acquisition.
But to earn high ratings, banks were forced to make increasingly risky loans to borrowers who wouldn't qualify for a mortgage under normal standards of creditworthiness. The Community Reinvestment Act, made even more stringent during the Clinton administration, trapped lenders in a Catch-22.
"If they comply," wrote Loyola College economist Thomas DiLorenzo, “they know they will have to suffer from more loan defaults. If they don't comply, they face financial penalties . . . which can cost a large corporation like Bank of America billions of dollars."
Banks nationwide thus ended up making more and more subprime loans and agreeing to dangerously lax underwriting standards - no down payment, no verification of income, interest-only payment plans, weak credit history. If they tried to compensate for the higher risks they were taking by charging higher interest rates, they were accused of unfairly steering borrowers into “predatory� loans they couldn't afford.
Trapped in a no-win situation entirely of the government's making, lenders could only hope that home prices would continue to rise, staving off the inevitable collapse. But once the housing bubble burst, there was no escape. Mortgage lenders have been bankrupted, thousands of subprime homeowners have been foreclosed on, and countless would-be borrowers can no longer get credit. The financial fallout has hurt investors around the world. And all of it thanks to the government, which was sure it understood the credit industry better than the free market did, and confidently created the conditions that made disaster unavoidable.
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe," warned Mark Twain, “while Congress is in session." Mark Twain was a humorist, but that was no joke.
http://patriotpost.us/opinion/entry.asp?entry_id=36700
← Prev | Tinnitus's Blog Home | Next →
Would you like to comment?
→ Join AbleNET Community for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.




