Basic Info
-
Technologist
![]()
Male, 38 years old
Los Angeles, United States
Last Login: 06 Sep, 2008
Tool Box
-
Recent Posts
-
→ Soft Power (Mon, 18 Aug 2008)
→ Response to Thomas Friedman (Sat, 16 Aug 2008)
→ No Smoking Hot Spot - Dr. David Evans in The Australian (Sun, 20 Jul 2008)
→ Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate (Fri, 18 Jul 2008)
→ 2006 Sojourners/Call to Renewal Conference Excerpt (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
→ Windfall Profits for Dummies (Sat, 03 May 2008)
→ Let's Pop the Deficit Bubble (Fri, 02 May 2008)
→ Esteem for US rises in Asia, thanks to Iraq war (Sat, 26 Apr 2008)
→ Notable & Quotable - From the latest debate among Democrats (Wed, 23 Apr 2008)
→ Older Americans wealthier, living longer (Fri, 28 Mar 2008)
→ The Erosion of Individual Responsibility (Sun, 23 Mar 2008)
→ How Government Makes Things Worse - Jeff Jacoby (Mon, 17 Mar 2008)
→ On the passing of William F. Buckley Jr. (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
→ Press Corps Quagmire (Tue, 19 Feb 2008)
→ She Said What? (Mon, 18 Feb 2008)
→ 'Realism' in Syria (Fri, 15 Feb 2008)
→ Greenhouse Affect (Wed, 13 Feb 2008)
→ Notable & Quotable (Wed, 13 Feb 2008)
→ 'Misinformed Craze' For Hybrids Delays Greener Technology (Mon, 11 Feb 2008)
→ Studies Say Biofuels Worse Than Gasoline (Sun, 10 Feb 2008)
Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 at 07:46 PM
The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming. The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science. The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming "incontrovertible."
In a posting to the APS forum, editor Jeffrey Marque explains,"There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution."
The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity -- the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause -- has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling. A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.
Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton's paper an "expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and "extensive errors"
In an email to DailyTech, Monckton says, "I was dismayed to discover that the IPCC's 2001 and 2007 reports did not devote chapters to the central 'climate sensitivity' question, and did not explain in proper, systematic detail the methods by which they evaluated it. When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method."
Link to remainder of article:
http://www.dailytech.com/Myth+of+Consensus+Explodes+APS+Opens+Global+Warming+Debate/article12403.htm
← Prev | Tinnitus's Blog Home | Next →
Would you like to comment?
→ Join AbleNET Community for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.




